A Freedom of Information request reveals that DWP’s Risk Assurance Division (RAD) received 60 referrals of allegations of fraud or abuse of New Deal programmes by New Deal providers for the period since April 2006 until end of December 2009. Read More…
DWP Risk Assurance Division receives 60 New Deal Fraud allegations
Posted in DWP, New Deal, Risk Assurance Division, new deal fraud | Tags: Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, New Deal, Risk Assurance Division
1 in 5 DWP staff sacked for Gross Misconduct; DWP shreds 2.63% of total workforce
Figures have been released after a Freedom of Information Act request revealing the extent of the Department for Work and Pensions own employment policies. They, however, refused to reveal how many dismissed members of staff signed on as a consequence.
To summarise:
- 1 in 5 dismissed DWP employees sacked for Gross Misconduct
- 122 members of staff were suspended
- DWP shreds 2.63% of its total workforce by dismissing staff members
- 80% of dismissals may have been due to employees being too kind on Jobseekers
- DWP declines to say how many staff members “turned tables” and claimed jobseekers after dismissal from DWP
Read More…
Merseyside “Welfare to Work” provider pays back £146 overpayment: employee fraud
A Freedom of Information request states:
I can confirm that from 1st April 2006 until 4th January 2010, one Welfare to Work Provider in Merseyside has had to pay back monies to DWP as a consequence of fraud. The overpayment was £146 and was the result of fraud by an individual employee of the company.
Welfare to Work, WhatDoTheyKnow.com;
However another Freedom of Information request states:
It is not possible to identify all recoveries of overpayments as these are typically offset against future payments due to the provider, and are simply reflected as reduced net payments.
Welfare to Work Merseyside, WhatDoTheyKnow.com; Read More…
Posted in DWP, Welfare Reform, jobcentre Plus, new deal fraud, unemployment | Tags: new deal fraud
UKIP and Workfare
If the UKIP gets into power they have the following ideas for workfare:
http://www.ukip.org/media/pdf/UKIPwelfare.pdf
Appendix 3: Examples of possible Workfare schemes
1.1. Additional small scale local public projects – low skilled
Litter patrols
Cleaning up graffiti
Snow removal on pavements in harsh weather
Maintenance of parks and gardens, street furniture, railway stations, bus stops,
schools, hospitals and social housing
Directing car parking on days when sports/concerts/other large events are in town
Running soup kitchens for the homeless
Packing “goody boxes” for troops stationed overseas
Delivering leaflets for the council, such as council newspapers or info scheme leaflets1.2. Additional small scale local public projects – semi-skilled and skilled
Extra tuition in the Three R’s
Teaching English as a foreign language
Work in nurseries and after-school clubs
Care for the elderly and disabled
Working as a guide at local historic sites
Administrative assistance on local councils and businesses which agree
Manning telephone switchboard at local council offices
These projects would be ‘additional’ in the sense that they will be in addition to
existing baseline local authority services and not supplant existing jobs or employees.1.3. Large scale public projects
All Government contracts for public works would require the use of the Workfare
scheme, including:Rail projects, such as new high-speed rail lines, reopened lines, rail rebuilding works
Road projects, such as new by-passes and motorways
Local transport infrastructure projects
Energy infrastructure projects
Utility infrastructure projects, such as flood defences, water grids, dams and reservoirs
New hospital projects
New school or college
Posted in human rights, jobcentre Plus, uk government, unemployment | Tags: workfare
Flexible New Deal scandal seeks travel deduction victims
Flexible New Deal scandal is seeking persons whom have been on New Deal recently and have had £4 weekly deductions from their travel allowances – or who are on New Deal towards the end of their course and have £4 deducted each week. Read More…
Too much legislation for DWP and Jobcentre Plus?
Flexible New Deal: TNG & YMCA Training approve someone with serious mental health issues to Dencora House
Flexible New Deal Scandal has received details of a tip off that someone with serious mental health issues is being made to attend Flexible New Deal at YMCA Training’s Dencora House this week. Read More…
Posted in DWP, Dencora House, Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal complaints, Ipswich, TNG, Training Network Group, Welfare Reform, YMCA Training, human rights, jobcentre Plus, uk government, unemployment | Tags: Dencora House, Flexible New Deal, health and safety, jobcentre Plus, restraining order, TNG, YMCA Training
Flexible New Deal: Millions stranded in No Man’s Land
We start off with two quotes from the Jobcentre Plus website:
Customers
New Deal
Find out about New Deal, including the ‘Flexible New Deal’ programme. Jobcentre Plus offers a number of New Deal programmes to help unemployed people, particularly those who have been unemployed for a long time, people with disabilities and anyone in need of extra help to find work
(http://www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk/JCP/Customers/outofworkhelplookingforwork/Getting_job_ready/Programmes_to_get_you_ready/New_Deal/index.html)
and
Customers
Flexible New Deal
Flexible New Deal aims to help you find a job, or get training or work experience to help you find a job. It is delivered for Jobcentre Plus by other organisations, called ‘providers’. Find out more information including who is eligible to take part.
(http://www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk/JCP/Customers/outofworkhelplookingforwork/Getting_job_ready/Programmes_to_get_you_ready/New_Deal/Dev_016411.xml.html)
At the end of Flexible New Deal Stage 3 your Adviser will refer you to a Flexible New Deal Provider that you have been allocated to. They will tell you that they will contact you within 2 weeks. As soon as you have been placed on Flexible New Deal Stage 4 (regardless if you have been contacted or not; before your first meeting) you no longer are a customer of Jobcentre Plus but belong to the Flexible New Deal Provider.
This means you lose all support from Jobcentre Plus including (but not limited to):
- Adviser Discretionary Fund (ADF)
- Jobgrant
- Recruitment Voucher / Recruitment Subsidy Voucher
- Self-Employment Credit
- Travel to Interview Scheme
- Work Trial
This means there is abolutely no support for those who:
- Want to be self-employed but need initial financial support
- Have an interview but not suitable clothing or the money for travel to get there
Flexible New Deal: ESL48JP Entitlement doubt guidance
On Flexible New Deal if you should receive a letter of notification from your Flexible New Deal provider stating that they have refered you to a decision maker for a Flexible New Deal sanction for whatever reason they should enclose the following guidance called ESL48JP. Read More…
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal Sanctions, decision maker, jobcentre Plus | Tags: DWP, ESL48JP, Flexible New Deal, jocbentre plus, Notes for Guidance
New Deal Contract published: can you spot a breach?
Ever wondered what a New Deal Contract looked like?
Happy New Year
We have published an entire New Deal Prime Contractor contract with DWP. This is a Multi-Programme i.e. refers to each provision type the Provider has i.e. VSO, ETF, Gateway etc. Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal, YMCA Training, jobcentre Plus, new deal fraud, uk government | Tags: New Deal Contract
New Deal Travel Deductions: DWP admits £4 deductions are unlawful
Finally! An update on the DWP and the New Deal £4 weekly travel deductions issue.
New Deal Scandal pointed out that the £4 weekly travel deductions on New Deal was unlawful due to no legislation making provision for such taxation… and DWP have finally admitted:
There is no legislation involved in this decision. The travel contribution has been set at £4 per week since the inception of New Deal in 1998. The New Deal was designed to offer new opportunities to customers who had struggled to find their own employment after some months on benefits. It is not unreasonable to expect customers to contribute towards costs involved in returning to work, including costs associated with travelling to programmes that give them additional help.
I had previously sent letters to the legal department at DWP (letters I will post seperately if you are interested) and neither warranted a reply. DWP made a statement on the WhatDoTheyKnow website in response to someones Freedom of Information Request which is available to read here: There is no legislation involved in this decision.
Please note that since DWP have attempted to revoke the response. (“The sender would like to recall the message, “Freedom of Information – 1221″.”)
This might be an “official secret” however as disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act published to an internet website, it is now “open domain” information so I will not pull this blog article.
Read More…
More Jobcentre Plus unsubstantiated false allegations…
This is just a post on Jobcentre Plus’ constant misbehaviour of accusing its “customers” (claimants) of acting in a way different to the actual events – unsubstantiated without evidence and even have the allegiance, endurance and persistance to uphold such false allegations when the claimant has evidence to prove otherwise!
As I came across a post on the internet about it and although I have already highlighted the problem in a past post I have decided to highlight this again as it is a HUGE problem. Read More…
Flexible New Deal Search Engine
The Flexible New Deal Scandal network is pleased to announce the launch of our Flexible New Deal search engine. Read More…
Posted in Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal complaints | Tags: Flexible New Deal Search Engine
Flexible New Deal: TNG Complaint – we dont know how to get there
Another TNG Complaint
So Avanta’s TNG (Training Network Group) are in the spotlight again. In Ipswich, they have been sending incorrect destination instructions to Flexible New Deal participants. Yes, failure to attend results in sanctions.
- Shows a map to a different place than the actual location – about half a mile difference
- Directs those who come by train to the right place (although instructions not clear)
- Specifies parking is available – for those who come by bus or via foot – parking not available at the actual location
- States several bus services stop at the Train Station and gives directions to the wrong place – in fact, neither of the buses actually stop at the train station – one bus station is a mile and a half from the wrong location as directed
- Even the directions from the St Felix House Jobcentre Plus Office diverts you to the wrong place – although the actual location is a mere few minute walk away
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal complaints, Ipswich, TNG, Training Network Group, jobcentre Plus | Tags: Avanta, DWP, Flexible New Deal, jobcentre Plus, TNG, Training Network Group
Flexible New Deal: Criticism of Dan Owens CV written by Working Links
Another Working Links Flexible New Deal complaint!
Typically with New Deal and Flexible New Deal we hear how bad people are treated including overcrowded rooms and 30 hour job search per week but we do not hear much about how New Deal and Flexible New Deal providers (Flexible New Deal prime contractors and subcontractors) try to help New Deal and Flexible New Deal participants back into work which is what they are paid to do.
Dan Owen from Claimants Action South Wales has uploaded Rachel Radeon’s (from Flexible New Deal provider Working Links) version of his CV which raises concerns about the lack of expertise and competence the employees of Flexible New Deal providers have.
If Flexible New Deal providers are replacing absolutely fine CVs (although maybe not perfect) with flawed CVs – how are the Flexible New Deal participants ever going to secure a job?
I think there is an extreme distinction between a no thrills CV a jobseeker has been using and a Flexible New Deal provider hindering the Flexible New Deal participants’ chances of securing employment to which they are paid for by enforcing them to use a poorly written CV with threats of sanctions or intimidating for not doing so.
Flexible New Deal Scandal investigates… (The full copy of Working Links’ attempt is at the bottom) Read More…
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal complaints, Working Links, jobcentre Plus | Tags: Abertillery, Dan Owen, DWP, Flexible New Deal, jobcentre Plus, Working Links
Appeal Tribunal: 6 weeks, no money
Workfare: Community Task Force
In 2010 the Government’s Young Person’s Guarantee will kick in. As part of this, a Community Task Force (CTF) will become mandatory for all 18-24 year olds who have been claiming over 12 months.
- In January 2010, it will be optional to take part.
- By Spring 2010 it will become mandatory.
The Community Task Force will consist of 25 hours work in the community over 5 days and 5 hours Supported Jobsearch per week for 3 months (optionally increased by another 3 months to to 6 months). Read More…
Posted in Community Task Force, DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, Young Persons Guarantee, jobcentre Plus | Tags: Community Service, Community Task Force, CTF, DWP, Environmental Task Force, ETF, ndyp, New Deal, New Deal for Young People, Voluntary Sector Option, vso, Work Trial, Young Persons Guarantee
Flexible New Deal: what you can expect and what we expect from you
Flexible New Deal
Flexible New Deal: What you can expect and what we expect from you (FND1 10/09)
Page 2
Jobcentre Plus and The Pension Service and the Disability and Carers Service are all
part of the Department for Work and Pensions. Each part delivers services to
different groups of people, but the whole Department is committed to meeting a
single set of customer service standards:
• Right treatment
• Right result
• On time
• Easy access
The leaflet ‘Our service standards’ explains more about what these standards mean for
you as a customer of Jobcentre Plus.
Some of the help you get is delivered for Jobcentre Plus by other organisations. We
call these organisations ‘providers’. You will still be a customer of Jobcentre Plus, and
these customer service standards still apply.
You can talk to us if you’re unhappy with the service you get from any provider working
on our behalf.
Contents (page 3)
Contents
About Flexible New Deal 4
What we expect from you 6
What happens if you don’t meet your responsibilities? 7
How will a sanction affect you? 8
How can you get money if you get a sanction? 9
How is a sanction decided? 10
What to do if you get a sanction 11
What to do if you get a 26 week sanction 12
If you’ve finished Flexible New Deal and still have a sanction 13
How to make a complaint 14
About Flexible New Deal (page 4)
About Flexible New Deal
Flexible New Deal aims to help you find a job, or to get training or work experience to help you find a job.
It is delivered for Jobcentre Plus by other organisations, which we call ‘providers’.
Providers are professional organisations who will offer you support that’s tailored to meet your needs.
They will make sure that your time with them is a positive and helpful one.
As part of Flexible New Deal, you and the provider will:
• discuss what help you need to find work
• draw up an action plan of things you’ll do to improve your chances of getting a job
• treat each other fairly
• attend meetings or take phone calls at the times agreed.
Part of Flexible New Deal includes you doing work experience for four weeks.
You may also get training and other support to help you find a job.
We hope that if you follow your action plan, you’ll leave Flexible New Deal because you’ve got a job.
About Flexible New Deal (page 5)
Flexible New Deal can last for a year. During this time you’re still a customer of Jobcentre Plus and:
• must attend the Jobcentre every two weeks while you get Jobseeker’s Allowance
• should report any change of circumstances to Jobcentre Plus, and
• can claim the cost of travel to job interviews.
If you don’t get a job while with the Flexible New Deal provider, then your Jobcentre will work closely
with you to build on the skills and experience you’ve gained.
What we expect from you (page 6)
What we expect from you
We’ve explained what you can expect from Flexible New Deal, but there are also things we expect from you.
Your responsibilities are to:
• make the most of the help your provider gives
• attend meetings or take phone calls at the times agreed
• complete any activities that you and the provider have agreed
• continue to actively look for work
• attend the Jobcentre every two weeks while you get Jobseeker’s Allowance, and
• tell Jobcentre Plus about any change in your circumstances.
If you don’t meet these responsibilities, your benefit may be affected.
What happens if you don’t meet your responsibilities? (page 7)
What happens if you don’t meet your responsibilities?
If you don’t meet your Flexible New Deal responsibilities your Jobseeker’s Allowance
could be stopped for a fixed number of weeks. This is called a ‘sanction’.
You could get a Flexible New Deal sanction if you:
• fail to attend the initial meeting with your provider
• refuse to complete any activity you’ve agreed with the provider
• give up your place on Flexible New Deal, or
• lose your place on Flexible New Deal through unacceptable behaviour.
You could also get a sanction if you refuse a job or leave a job without good reason.
It’s very important that you tell your provider i you’re having problems
or can’t take part in Flexible New Deal at any time for any reason.
Remember — if you are unsure of your Flexibl New Deal responsibilities,
or need any further information or explanation, talk to your provider or a Jobcentre Plus adviser. Read More…
Posted in Flexible New Deal | Tags: Flexible New Deal, FND1, jobcentre Plus
Flexible New Deal: Customer identity checks
Flexible New Deal Guidance
Customer identity checks/fraud action
14.14. It is important that in any communications with customers you verify the customers identity, ensuring that you are satisfied the customer is who they say they are.
These checks could include asking the customer to state their:
- full name;
- date of birth;
- address; and
- National Insurance number.
14.15. You may also decide to request further information such as details that were included within the original referral from JCP such as:
- a customers preferred employment goals; or
- details of a customer’s previous 2 periods of employment
14.16. It is your responsibility to carry these identity checks and you may decide to use a combination of this information to verify identity.
14.17. If you suspect someone is impersonating a customer fraud action should be taken. The National Benefit Fraud Hotline (0800 854 440) is a government service for the confidential reporting of benefit fraud. Reports of suspected fraud can be made by post, over the telephone or online.
Read More…
Guide to Decision Makers Guide (DMG)
This is a quick guide on the Department for Work and Pensions‘ Decision Makers Guide… Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal | Tags: 26 week sanctions, 4 week sanctions, benefit sanctions, decision maker, decision makers guide, dmg, DWP, EO, ETF, FTET, gateway 2 work, nd25, ndyp, New Deal, sanctions, vso
A4e to lose Flexible New Deal contract for fraud: other training providers also under investigation
The Department for Work and Pensions has been investigating Action 4 Employment and at least 2 other undisclosed training providers for fraud over the last 13 months – this comes after Maatwerk had their contract terminated for fraud.
This means that even though they weren’t restricted or blacklisted from bidding for Flexible New Deal contracts: they will now lose the Flexible New Deal contracts after at least 20 cases of fraud have been discovered in May 2008 at A4e in Hull where two staff members falsified forms meant for the employer and also forged signatures on the forms in order to receive job outcome bonuses from DWP.
Action 4 Employment was also involved in a temporary job recruitment agency scam – thus forcing New Deal participants into temporary work which resulted in more job outcome bonuses from DWP.
Another New Deal provider has been forced to repay £48,000 for fraud – the name of the provider hasn’t been disclosed.
The DWP was happy to pay Pertemps PDG over 2 million when a report clearly stated fraud – in this instance no concerns other than as a report were raised.
Also, so far all fraud cases were consisting of forged signatures on forms and such like – the DWP have not yet picked up on timesheet abuses (paid to be there for x hours, as shown on timesheets, but participants are there for significantly less i.e. 10 hours instead of 30), dismissal abuses (dismissing participants for false or trivial reasons to receive full 13 weeks amount without them being there for even half that time), guaranteed jobs bonuses abuse (some participants have received a job offer before having to do the course starting 2-6 weeks after the course starts, providers still get job outcome payments intended as a bonus if they get the participant work, even if they had nothing to do with it) and future job outcome bonuses abuse (getting participants to enter an agreement where the provider has “permission” to contact any future employer after the course has ended to get job outcome bonus even though you got the job after the course unaided by them) to name a few.
Posted in Action 4 Employment, DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, Working Links | Tags: a4e, Action 4 Employment, DWP, Flexible New Deal, fraud, government fraud, jobcentre Plus, maatwerk, New Deal, unemployment
New Deal ends in half of Great Britain
Since Monday, in half the country there will be no new referrals to New Deal. This could be due to implementing the Flexible New Deal or due to revelations of New Deal fraud we recently reported, as the Flexible New Deal (if contracts are signed on time) are not due to begin until October allowing a 13 week programme to commence this week.
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, Welfare Reform | Tags: Flexible New Deal, fnd, labour, New Deal, new deal fraud
New Deal should be subjected to a Serious Fraud Office inquiry
All New Deal training providers, past and present should be subject to an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office. The fraud investigation can’t be conducted by the Department for Work and Pensions as they also fall under the suspicion of fraudulent activity and other acts of unlawful misconduct and requires an outside independent investigation. Read More…
New Deal fraud technique: “exiting”
The illegal act of:
- Acknowledging that regardless of the actual period of time the New Deal participant spends on the course they will get the full amount for the entire 13 weeks, unless they exceed their absence limit where they wont
- Short listing those who appear not to be able to make the entire 13 weeks or those who are close to exceeding permitted absence limits to be dismissed – those who seem likely to “drop out” will not award provider with Job Outcome bonuses thus are surplus to requirements and those that are close to the limit regardless of being in their rights and not committing an offence are likely to become a liability to limit the amount projected to be received.
- Acknowledging that the Jobseeker cannot appeal or prevent being dismissed, has no rights to find out the reason for dismissal or have a chance to put right/get a second chance, and that it takes immediate effect.
- Short listing random people for dismissal to ease overcrowding of training centres
- Making false declarations under oath of a disclaimer claiming reasons for dismissals as rather severe (misconduct, Health and safety concerns etc.) all being lies, knowing that the Dismissal Form has a sole purpose of helping a Decision Maker impose sanctions on a jobseeker, who doesn’t get to see such a form.
- Tell the Jobseeker verbally an entire different story (such as due to attitude, not contributing enough etc.) consisting of rather mild reasons, so when he or she becomes required to give reasons why the training course ended or appeals to a decision of benefit sanctions, the jobseeker merely complains about something irrelevant to the actual stated reason and becomes sanctioned as a result.
- When a Decision Maker writes to the Training Provider, the training provider delays the reply so when the Decision Maker writes to the Jobseeker, he or she doesn’t get a copy of the answers provided as the system is intended to do.
- Now that the people were exited – the training providers profit margins further reach the projections.
… is known as “exiting“. Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal, YMCA Training | Tags: dismissed, exited, exiting, jobcentre Plus, New Deal, new deal fraud, YMCA Training
Abolish the Jobseekers Agreement
As from today the New Deal Scandal network will be also promoting the abolishment of the Jobseekers Agreement (JSAg), an proposed act of Welfare Reform Read More…
Posted in DWP, Welfare Reform | Tags: Equality, Jobseekers Act 1995, Jobseekers agreement, jobseekers allowance, jsa, Welfare Reform
New Deal Fraud: A4e and Working Links response
Both Action 4 Employment and Working Links publicly release a statement on the Channel 4 News report broadcast on the 30th June 2009, dated 28/06/2009 (A4e) and 29/06/2009 (Working Links) up to 2 days before the public were aware of their fraudulent activities. Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal, Working Links | Tags: a4e, new deal fraud, Working Links
New Deal fraud: A4e employee jailed for fraud
Former Action 4 Employment (A4e) employee Elizabeth Orsman has been jailed for fraud with a total value of £15,833. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, DWP, New Deal | Tags: a4e, a4e fraud, benefit fraud, new deal fraud
New Deal Fraud: Over 278 full fraud investigations
Evidence from 2003 has been uncovered showing information on fraud investigations of New Deal in the first 5 years of New Deal. You may have heard about cases regarding companies such as A4e, Maatwerk and Working Links being investigated for fraud, however, official Parliament documents show that up until winter 2002 there was over 278 in depth fraud investigations against New Deal providers, almost 2000 allegations of fraud committed by New Deal prime contractors and the rate of cases year on year seems to be on the increase. Read on for more! Read More…
1,869 fraud tip offs in the first half of New Deal
New Deal Scandal can reveal that there were 1,869 allegations of fraud made against New Deal providers within the first 5 years – 15% of these allegations (or roughly 1 in 6) resulted in full fraud investigations being carried out. Read More…
Welfare Reform Bill: There is more to come…
As the entire UK goes crazy with shocking new plans of changing welfare in the country, New Deal Scandal reveals that the worse is still to come! You thought the Welfare Reform Bill was bad? Read on… Read More…
Posted in Welfare Reform
New Deal fraud: the techniques used to rip off the taxpayer
Many New Deal providers are using a whole range of fraudulent techniques to receive money unlawfully from the Government. The Government generally isn’t interested in knowing about these techniques, they only recognise the fraud that is forging employer signatures. Read More…
What's the point in Human Rights?
This article focuses on Human Rights in the United Kingdom.
How does the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights work in the United Kingdom? Read More…
Department for Work and Pensions: thousand bogus applications
The Government department was involved in a racial experiment with recruitment processes says the Institute of Economic Affairs, which involved sending two identical applications for 1,000 jobs – the difference being one was a typical “white British” name and the other was from a pool of names from different “ethnic minority” groups to compare the outcome . The Equality and Human Rights Commission – those who failed to pick up on New Deal, the proposed Flexible New Deal and Welfare Reform Bill – urges a clause in the Equality Bill to ban names in application forms. Read More…
Posted in DWP | Tags: Equality and Human Rights Commission, Equality Bill, ethnic minority
Reed in Partnership and the £3 million illegal immigrant fraud
New Deal Scandal recently reported that New Deal Provider Reed in Partnership was under investigation for multi-million pound fraud in 2001; we now can disclose that just two years later the Department for Work and Pensions was involved in a multi agency investigation of a fraud estimated at £3 million involving them finding jobs for illegal immigrants including failed asylum seekers.
DESPITE THESE TWO PREVIOUS MULTI-MILLION POUND FRAUDS:
Reed in Partnership still holds Government Contracts (including New Deal Prime Contractor, Employment Zone, Pathways to Work Phase 2). Where is the logic in that?
Posted in DWP, New Deal, new deal fraud | Tags: DWP, employment zone, illegal immigrants, New Deal, new deal fraud, pathway to work, reed in partnership
Jobcentre Plus suppression continues: jobseekers have zero rights
It is official: jobseekers have no rights. Jobcentre Plus doesn’t follow the law. There is no punishment against the Department for Work and Pensions for breaking the law or for human rights violations. Claiming benefits has become more difficult with many Benefit Delivery Centres using lie detectors which work by picking up anxiety etc. in the voice, the norm once been on hold for 20+ minutes, resulting in some people being unable to claim… and to top it off now New Deal Scandal has received numerous reports of jobseekers being removed from the Jobcentre without any legal justification and incriminated. Read More…
Posted in DWP, human rights, uk government | Tags: DWP, dwp corruption, government suppression, jcp, jobcentre Plus
Jobcentre Plus suppression continues: false allegations
We recently reported about Jobcentre Plus suppression regarding the misuse of security officers and police time in ejecting jobseekers from the Jobcentre Plus offices for false incriminating reasons to prevent them getting their legal entitlement.
This misconduct was only the start: a blog reader added more worrying concerns who states that the Hackney Jobcentre Plus prevents Jobseekers using the Jobpoints also requesting police to remove the unemployed from the building. The misuse of public services which could be better used for fighting crime seems to be an growing common trait at the Jobcentre Plus offices around the country.
The Jobcentre now stops the unemployed jobseekers from accessing jobs: a requirement for receiving Jobseekers Allowance; an welfare benefit for those without employment to survive on.
This article focuses on more issues regarding the services provided by the largest UK Government department including making false allegations towards people, a claim I can also personally defend from my own circumstances and various sources all over the country too and also in the case we reported in the above article. Read More…
Posted in DWP, human rights, uk government
New Deal: YMCA Training discloses confidential information to tracking statistic firm
YMCA Training has, without their New Deal participants consent, sent their contact details to some statistics company who has contacted them asking to complete an anonymous survey on the YMCA Training New Deal courses.
This company, however, uses a unique tracking code to check up on who said what – not anonymous – and the letter contained details advising the person taking the survey that they wouldn’t be able to be traced. Read More…
Posted in Dencora House, Ipswich, New Deal, YMCA Training | Tags: learner survey, QDP services, YMCA Training
Jobcentre Plus: security and assaults
You may have heard about assaults on Jobcentre Plus staff in the news, however, these figures are largely distorted. They refer to Incident Cases and not solely due to physical assault – which we will explain later.
Six months ago Jobcentre Plus boasted over 1,600 security guards costing the taxpayer over £40 million a year. I am sure this amount will be on the increase as new claimants are increasing.
This article will focus on: a) are all these security guards necessary? and b) how many actual assaults were there?
Posted in DWP, uk government | Tags: Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, Job centre, jobcentre, jobcentre Plus, physical abuse, verbal abuse
Jobseekers Allowance Scandal
Jobseekers Allowance: the Scandal (A MUST READ FOR ALL JOBSEEKERS)
How many scandals can there possibly be?! Its becoming crazy now…
Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal, Welfare Reform, uk government | Tags: DWP, Jobseeker Agreement, jobseekers allowance, jsa, low income, poverty, unemployment benefit
What the DWP doesn't want you to know…
205 laptops lost or stolen full of confidential information.
Apparently the figures are as follows
2004 – 75 Laptops
2005 – 46 Laptops
2006 – 28 Laptops
2007 – 15 Laptops
2008 – 41 Laptops
£266,000 spent on entertainment.
2003-04 £79,000 (this particular figure is apparently just a estimate)
2004-05 £28,000
2005-06 £43,000
2006-07 £106,000
2007-08 £10,000Maybe its all the christmas parties, who knows…
Thanks to the volunteers at the United Kingdom Benefits Information eXchange forums (UKBIX). A very recommended source by New Deal Scandal.
Posted in DWP, uk government | Tags: Department for Work and Pensions
Update: QDP Services & YMCA Training
We recently reported that YMCA Training is disclosing past New Deal participants personal and confidential details which they should no longer hold, to a company called QDP Services, without the New Deal participants permission.
I thought it would be best to follow up this by quoting Q D P Services‘ pledge regarding handling confidential information.
It is best to point out that QDP Services are not to blame for the data disclosure – it is YMCA Training who kept the confidential data longer than required, a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 and then disclosed it without permission.
QDP Services, however, are accountable for the” anonymous” survey which is tracked.
Posted in Dencora House, Ipswich, New Deal, YMCA Training | Tags: Data Protection Act 1998, QDP services, Sally Smith, YMCA Training
a4e bank: deposit your Jobseekers here!
It has been a rumour been going around for several months now, it deserves a post!
A4e founder Emma Harrison is said to have an ambition to start a bank!
That’s right, she wants to start a bank aimed at poor and disadvantaged communities (or Jobseekers)! Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, uk government | Tags: a4e bank, emma harrison, jobseekers allowance
a4e: 47 welfare contracts but only 1 in 5 secure employment
In the last financial year, 2008-09, Action for Employment (a4e), the largest welfare to work provider who has 47 active welfare to work provisions only resulted in 20% of their clients securing employment. This is quite short of the 45% target.
Posted in Action 4 Employment, DWP | Tags: a4e, watching a4e
Jobseekers Act 1995 (as amended)
If you are seeking work and claiming Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) you would have heard about the Jobseekers Act 1995 however you are probably more familiar with it being written and acknowledged as the Jobseekers Act 1995 (as amended).
What does this mean? Read on for a brief explanation on the law that applies to you. Read More…
Posted in DWP, Welfare Reform, uk government | Tags: Jobseekers Act 1995, jobseekers allowance
Housing Benefit Amendment (no 2) Regulations 2009
The Social Security Advisory Committee (SSAC) has been asked by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to consider proposals for the above named regulations.
Currently, if the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rate is higher than their contractual rent, customers are able to keep the excess benefit up to a maximum of £15 per week. The main change that these proposals would introduce is to limit the amount of Housing Benefit a person can be entitled to, to the level of their rent liability.
These changes would mean that:
- all those claiming housing benefit in the deregulated private sector on or after 5 April 2010 would not be entitled to any excess benefit over their contractual rent; and
- existing claimants who are currently entitled to an excess payment of up to £15, would see a reduction in their benefit when their claims are reviewed, usually on the anniversary date of their claim,
Before the Committee considers and reports on these proposals, it would like to hear from organisations and individuals who have views, in particular on the following aspects of the proposed changes:
- The potential impact of a reduction in income on the customers who will lose out;
- The potential effects of the amendments on child poverty;
- Equality issues, including the potential effect of the proposed changes on minority groups;
- The results of removing such an incentive for the customer to take more responsibility for their housing costs
- The possible unforseen repercussions, such as the behavioural responses of landlords and tenants.
The Committee would also like to hear from welfare rights advisers, landlords and others who may be able to supply information about the customer groups affected by the proposed change.
Those wishing to make representations to the Committee may obtain a copy of the Department’s explanatory memorandum and a copy of the draft regulations from the Secretary to the Committee, Gill Saunders (0207 412 1506) or from the SSAC website: www.ssac.org.uk.
Representations should be sent to the Committee at New Court, 48 Carey Street, London, WC2A 2LS, or by email to ssac@dwp.gsi.gov.uk, or via the consultation response facility on the website, to arrive no later than 03/08/2009
Comments welcome. From DWP News.
New Deal: wasn't designed for the "highly skilled"
New Deal wasn’t designed for those with higher skills: why not? Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, DWP, New Deal, uk government | Tags: degrees, New Deal, oxford university
How to negotiate a Jobseekers Agreement
So you are unemployed, about to make a claim for Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) or have made a new claim for Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) however not attended an New Jobseeker Interview (NJI) yet. This article explains what you need to know about claiming Jobseekers Allowance.
You wouldn’t have thought that the Jobseekers Agreement (JSAg) would be a crutial element to claiming. The problem is most claimants see it as simply a pathetic agreement which is created just as procedure, whereas the truth is the Jobseekers Agreement is in effect, within a limited capacity, your power to create a law to your specification of how some elements of the Jobseekers Act 1995 (as amended) are implemented and used.
The Jobseekers Agreement (JSAg) has two main uses:- The first is to trap the typical naive Jobseeker in to being required to apply for more widespread jobs than otherwise could be argued as reasonable. As the average jobseeker doesn’t realise the full impact of the Jobseekers Agreement they will go along with whatever the Employment Officer (EO) suggests, they then sign and it becomes a large element of the rules for receiving Jobseekers Allowance. The second reason is for the Jobseekers Agreement to be used for enforcement – or should I say to decide about applying sanctions or refusing later benefit claims.
You may also hear the Jobseekers Agreement (JSAg) being an agreement you negotiate, where you pledge what you will do weekly to find work, what your responsibilities are, your availability and what restrictions you have.
Was it just me? ..Or did I hear the word negotiate mentioned? Read on… Read More…
Posted in DWP | Tags: benefit, DWP, jcp, jobcentre, Jobseekers agreement, jobseekers allowance, jsa, JSAg, unemployed, unemployment
£250 million cut to Housing Benefit: claimants plunged deeper into poverty
People are increasingly loosing jobs, forced to sign on to receive Jobseekers Allowance to scrape by, hundreds of people are now applying for the same jobs and if that wasn’t bad enough, in a bid to save £234 million a year, the Government has decided to pull the £15 per week excess from Local Housing Allowance which is to affect over 300,000 claimants including families.
New Deal Scandal believes that with the surge in new claims, that £234 million a year figure could rise to £250 million within a few months after coming in to effect next year.
At this time of widespread need, the public should be able to rely on the Government giving them extra support – after all collectively we have been paying taxes and their wages for the last few decades. Read More…
New Deal: A third went off benefits afterwards without finding employment
Statistics published on New Deal for Young People (NDYP) up to November 2008, shows a worrying trend with almost a third (31.27%) of New Deal participants not securing employment and not reclaiming benefit.
Previously published articles such as Dencora House detention centre and various news articles on “jobseekers being treated like cattle” showing the poor under resourced and mistreatment of participants comes to no surprise how so many people (411,190 to be exact) have decided to plunge deeper into poverty to have their Human Rights respected. I am sure a few people would have won some money on the horses or on the lottery but in the majority of cases will be strictly relying on friends and family to survive. Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal | Tags: Dencora House, Flexible New Deal, nd25, ndyp, New Deal, New Deal for Young People
Icelandic bank scandal
This has nothing to do with DWP, Jobcentre Plus or New Deal. I have been constantly thinking whether to post this or not, and I have decided to post it.
Icelandic Bank Scandal
Posted in uk government | Tags: Icelandic bank, Icelandic bank scandal
£1.2 billion DWP Fraud: DWP Underspend, Claimants struggle
As a Jobseekers Allowance claimant myself (when my claim hasn’t been stopped or suspended for trivial reasons such as not attending an interview they never told me about) I am not surprised that the National Audit Office (NAO) has reported a £1.2 billion under spend last year.
To stick this figure into prospective (remember it is the DWP as a whole not just JSA) if the figure comprised totally of Jobseekers Allowance at the higher rate of £60 per week, it makes 10 million payments of 20 million benefit weeks not being paid out, or 384,615 claimants a year receiving no Jobseekers Allowance at all even though entitled to do so by law.
In fact this raises a huge question about DWP, Jobcentre Plus; and their repeatedly unlawful tactics and techniques to take ones legal entitlement away, which I will explain later in to the article. As the Jobseekers Act 1995 (as amended) makes it your legal entitlement and the Jobcentre is doing the best to avoid paying that money out to you this comes under fraud in my definition and as such this £1.2 billion under spend will be categorised as a £1.2 billion fraud.
This is on top of the £750 million under spending on the Tax Credits system – resulting in 1.2 million claims not being made. We recently reported about the Jobseekers Allowance Scandal and the quarter of a billion pounds a year Housing Allowance cut. Read More…
Posted in DWP, uk government | Tags: Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, DWP Fraud, jobseekers allowance, jsa, NAO, National Audit Office
Do you trust the Department for Work and Pensions with your data?
If the answer is yes, then you should think again!
Details published from DWP themselves from the DWP Survey 2009 – a survey of 73,006 people (71%) – a response of under 3 in 4 members of staff, show some worrying statistics. Is your data safe? Read More…
Posted in DWP, uk government | Tags: data loss, Department for Work and Pensions, DWP
26% of DWP employees do not know if they have qualifications
The DWP Survey 2009, states that 26% of employees taking the survey (71% of the total workforce) answered “not sure” to the following question: “Do you possess a Level 2 qualification (NVQ, BTEC, 5 GCSEs Grade A-C, or equivalent) or above?“. That is 18,982 employees not sure about their own qualifications. Read More…
Posted in DWP, uk government | Tags: Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, DWP Survey 2009
A4e, Secrets and Censorship
This is criticism against A4e and how they manage their business. This is relevant because they are the largest New Deal provider receiving money from, (guess who?) you, the taxpayer!
I couldn’t resist but to disclose how strange A4e operates being such a large company and all. I don’t know of anything like it. Please feel to continue reading (no its got nothing to do with the fraud investigation) Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, DWP, New Deal, uk government | Tags: a4e, internet censorship, New Deal
98% of Jobcentre Plus formal feedback are complaints
Just looked at the statistics on display at the Jobcentre the other day. In the last few months (last quarter) they received 247 complaints to only 5 praises. A complaint is one to the District Manager in writing not a verbal complaint, written complaint/letter to your personal adviser or unofficial complaint made online in form of feedback.
If this figure included verbal complaints and complaints to your personal adviser then it would be much higher.
Posted in DWP, Ipswich | Tags: jobcentre, jobcentre Plus
New Deal: New Deal providers are exempt from local planning laws
A4e Finance Director Resignation: the evidence
Please see the exact 288b form used to terminate the directorship below. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, uk government | Tags: 288b, a4e, A4e Ltd, director resignation
Housing Poverty: action required now!
We have all heard about the Jobseekers Allowance Scandal, how LHA rates in most areas have fell dramatically while the rent prices have not decreased by so much and now today, we at New Deal Scandal expose the unfair charges that estate agents such as JSM Property (who were lucky to be featured, a nice link back above) imposed on people trying to get a roof over their heads. Read More…
Posted in uk government | Tags: housing, Housing Allowance, JSM Property, Local Housing Allowance, poverty, scams, unemployment
A4e and NSPCC
You might be aware of A4e founder Emma Harrison’s involvement with the NSPCC. You might also be aware of the hub page regarding A4e supporting the British Heart Foundation by dumping its VSO clients there. We can report that A4e actually has done a U-turn on supporting charitable organisations such as the NSPCC, to which Emma Harrison is (or was) the Chairperson of the NSPCC’s Regional Full Stop Appeal and CEO Mark Lovell sits (or did sit) on the National Corporate Sponsorship Board of the NSPCC. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, emma harrison | Tags: a4e, A4e - NSPCC Limited, A4e Fundraising Ltd, emma harrison, NSPCC
Jobcentre fraudster steals £24,373 by Giro scam
UKBIX announces to New Deal Scandal that Mark Hamilton, 36, a civil servant working at a Jobcentre Plus office in Scotland stole over £24,000 from Giros he made and cashed after he stole blank giros when the Jobcentre Plus office merged with another.
His seven month scamming spree was brought to a close when the DWP Fraud team contacted the police.
What took the DWP so long to notice? Read More…
Posted in DWP | Tags: civil servant, jobcentre, jobcentre Plus, Mark Hamilton
Internet Censorship: Why A4e should take a leaf out of Metropolitan International School's book
A4e should give up trying to censor blogs like this one. For one, this is hosted in America for an American company and thus under American law they are NOT liable for the content contained within – so please stop harrassing them. They are only the middleman/service provider, not the publisher, I am. Metropolitan International School recently lost a court case against search engine giant Google (who happens to contain a lot of content from this blog, I wouldn’t advise going after them…) and found this out. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment | Tags: a4e, internet censorship, Metropolitan International Schools, skillstrain, Train2game
YMCA Training traded without planning permission over 6 months
£187,500: how much it cost Taxpayers to get a Jobseeker off the dole
£187,500
This is the amount it cost Taxpayers to get a single Jobseeker of the dole.
This is the bombshell that stuck the final nail in the coffin of New Deal. A scheme setup by Gordon Brown for New Labour aiming to get less people claiming unemployment benefits and stop living a “life on benefits” lifestyle.
How did we come across this figure? Well… The New Deal scheme costs Taxpayers £75 billion and claimants have dropped by 400,000 people (this figure excludes the surge in new claimants due to the economical crisis) – this equates for each person who is not claiming benefit: £187,500!!
Of course, we shouldn’t presume that these 400,000 people have all obtained sustainable full time jobs, due to benefits being made more difficult to claim in this period. We also can’t presume or expect that these 400,000 less claims were a result from the New Deal courses.
What I can quite confidently state that with £75 Billion instead of the 13 week New Deal courses, the Government could have employed 9 times more people (assuming that those 400,000 people got full time jobs) – or 3.6 million people to stick it as a figure – full time on an annual salary of £20,000 for one year.
Alternatively, they could have employed over 360,000 people on a £20,000 annual salary for 10 years.
Posted in New Deal | Tags: benefits, gordon brown, jobseeker, New Deal, new labour, taxpayers, tony blair, uk government, unemployment
Welfare Reform: Criticism
I was reading a great article on Welfare Reform (the Welfare Reform Bill 2009) however I greatly disagreed with the points made in the article so I decided to quote sections of it and comment!
The Welfare Reform Bill is to be a tough piece of legislation that will compel people in meeting with their obligations. It comes as no surprise and is long overdue. One of the first targets will be in removing 1 million people off Incapacity Benefit and into work. The entire benefits system is to be streamlined with Income Support being replaced with a leaner ‘out of work benefits’ system. The time has come by which those who “fiddle” the system should take account of what their obligations and duties are.
Removing one million people off “Incapacity Benefit”? Incapacity Benefit doesn’t exist. To the best of my knowledge the Welfare Reform Act 2007 replaced Incapacity Benefit and Income Support with an Employment and Support Allowance in 2008.
Posted in Welfare Reform | Tags: benefits, DWP, esa, jcp, jobcentre, jsa, Welfare Reform
A4e experiments tax avoidance: pays no tax
New Deal Scandal can reveal that A4e had tried to avoid paying tax. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment | Tags: a4e, llp
New Jobcentre Plus Chief Executive is pro compulsory national volunteering
New Deal Scandal can reveal that the new Jobcentre Plus CEO, Darra Singh OBE, was one of the masterminds behind a new National Service system where in particular young unemployed people are to be forced to “volunteer” or lose their benefits. Read More…
Posted in DWP, Welfare Reform, human rights, uk government | Tags: Darra Singh OBE, DWP, jobcentre Plus, Lesley Strathie, Mel Groves, National Service
Mark Stanley replaces Neil Watson as Finance Director for A4e
New Deal Scandal can reveal that Neil Watson resigned as a director in addition to dropping down to a less senior position while Mark Stanley took the position of Finance Director. This is a very rare occurence in business. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment | Tags: a4e, Darren Marsh, Mark Stanley, neil watson
Been on New Deal? You are likely to be owed over £50
After some extensive research into UK Unemployment Benefit (Jobseekers Allowance) and New Deal related legislation, New Deal Scandal can inform you, confirmed by DWP, that the £4 weekly travel deductions are unlawful. This means New Deal participants past and present are entitled to be reimbursed. Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal, new deal fraud, uk government | Tags: DWP, jobseekers allowance, jsa, New Deal, training allowance
Everyone in Ely has visited us!
It only seemed a couple of days ago that I added a statement to the right sidebar saying we had just exceeded over 12,500 unique visitors.
Just now I have noticed it saying 15,007 unique visitors… a bit of research tells me it is approximately the size of the Cambridgeshire city of Ely. Read More…
Posted in 1 | Tags: new deal scandal
517 London Road planning permission finally applied for
New Deal Fraud: 4 outstanding fraud investigations
New Deal Scandal can reveal that as of the end of July 2009 there are 4 ongoing fraud investigations regarding New Deal and 1 regarding Pathways to Work. Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal, new deal fraud, uk government | Tags: DWP, fraud, Jim Knight, John McDonnell, New Deal, new deal fraud, new deal scandal, Pathways to Work
No prosecutions for New Deal Fraud
New Deal Scandal can reveal that the Department for Work and Pensions has no intention for making any prosecutions for prime contractors deliberately defrauding the system. The Department for Work and Pensions currently has no plans of stopping Flexible New Deal contracts being awarded to prime contractors who have previously defrauded the system on numerous occassions for the New Deal contracts. Read More…
How the Government can solve Unemployment for FREE!
For over a decade the Government has seen to want to throw money at solving problems such as unemployment, which doesn’t work. I don’t doubt for one second that the New Deal created loads of new jobs and helped people find employment. Sadly though these jobs were mostly for training providers to help deliver the scheme. Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal, uk government | Tags: Flexible New Deal, future jobs fund, labour, New Deal, new labour, recession, uk government, unemployment
National Minimum Wage (NMW)
The National Minimum Wage (NMW) has celebrated 10 years this year. 1.5 million people are cheated out of receiving the National Minimum Wage. New Deal Scandal asks “Has the National Minimum Wage solved anything?” Read More…
90,000 formal complaints to Jobcentre Plus
New Deal Scandal can reveal that there were 91,054 formal complaints made to the Jobcentre Plus District Managers over the last 2 years. This is around 3,794 complaints a month on average. Read More…
Posted in DWP | Tags: jcp, jobcentre Plus, Jobcentre Plus complaints
A4e Benefit Busters
For a 3 part documentary called “Benefit Busters” two episodes will feature A4e. One episode that was shown on the 20th August 2009 was at A4e Doncaster focusing on lone parents whilst the other episode coming up next week will be at A4e Hull focusing on the unemployed.
At A4e Doncaster, Hayley Taylor co-ordinates a 6 week intensive course named Elevate which aims to give lone parents the confidence and skills to enter employment and persuade them they will be better off working than continuing to claim benefit.
It was largely thought that the programme would be criticising a4e and be bad publicity; it was a PR stunt all along to help develop promotion while they attempt to move in to America. My inbox was flooded with websites picking up on the A4e biased publicity from a press release and was only the last couple of days when a few sources picked up on the fame of the lone parents involved. The A4e website even has a page dedicated to Benefit Busters.
A4e Benefit Busters: why A4e isn't the answer for welfare
As we all might be aware that the Channel 4 Benefit Busters show was designed for publicity for A4e rather than a fair insight in to the benefit system.
Thursday’s (20th August) show which featured the training provider Action for Employment (otherwise known as A4e) and their star tutor/trainer/sales person/staff member Hayley Taylor (which I hear has since been sacked) pursuing ten single mums in to making the transition of going back to work, highlighted a major flaw.
Yes the PR backfired. Not solely due to opinion on the show which i will report later in a separate blog article but rather by their lack of success as the UK market-leader of providing Government welfare schemes. Read More…
A4e Benefit Busters Single Mums Review
So it has been a hot topic in the recent week…. Benefit Busters at A4e Doncaster.
I have already expressed disappointment regarding the low outcome by A4e the largest welfare provider in the UK that also has business interests overseas.
Since the Benefit Busters show, I have been reviewing feedback across the internet. The comments are shocking! Read More…
Working Links: no longer under investigation
We can report (thanks to UKBIX) that The Guardian has apologised on behalf of The Observer who had been misinformed by the Department for Work and Pensions for reporting recruitment company Working Links to be still under investigation for fraud.
IT NO LONGER APPEARS THAT WORKING LINKS IS UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR FRAUD. Read More…
Posted in DWP, Working Links, new deal fraud
Benefit Busters: Episode 2 Preview
Benefit Busters is on again tomorrow at 9pm. The first episode of Series 1 of Benefit Busters spreaded a lot of anger of Princess Emma of Sheffield in her mansion and A4e: the largest New Deal Provider.
New Deal Scandal will review the preview clips of Episode 2 of Benefit Busters – this show could really damage the reputation of A4e. The clips are “Easier on the dole” and “Job ready“. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, DWP, New Deal, emma harrison, uk government | Tags: a4e, Action 4 Employment, Actively Seeking Employment, Benefit Busters, benefit scroungers, Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, emma harrison, Flexible New Deal, genuine jobseeker, jobcentre Plus, National Minimum Wage, New Deal, uk government, unemployment
Benefit scroungers are Britains most annoying pet hate
It is official – the Government has succeeded with its campaign against bullying genuine claimants from claiming benefits they are legally entitled to. In a survey of the 100 most annoying things for 2008, benefit scroungers bet the Credit Crunch and Gordon Brown to the top spot. Read More…
Posted in Benefit Busters, DWP, uk government | Tags: Attendance Allowance, Benefit Busters, benefit scroungers, benefits, Child Benefit, Disability Living Allowance, Employment and Support Allowance, Housing Allowance, Housing Benefit, jobseekers allowance, jsa, Tax Credits, unemployment, Working Tax Credits
Did A4e get Benefit Busters Episode 2 pulled from On Demand?
It seems that Channel 4’s Benefit Busters Episode 2 was pulled from Virgin Media On Demand service and the online 4od service. Why?
Rumour has it that perhaps A4e ordered the On Demand/Catch Up availability to be removed due to concerned pressures over the services provided which could lose them their Flexible New Deal contracts (?) and also there has been next to none reviews of the Episode 2 Long-term Unemployed show in the press.
I am aware that it was added to On Demand but since it has been pulled and “Dolce Vito – Dream Restaurant” replaced the 9pm Channel 4 slot on Thursday’s the 27th August On Demand (even though this programme was on at 8.30pm).
It also is reported that the repeat show has been dropped from Mondays listings.
Is A4e censoring the internet once again and goign a step further with the press?
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal | Tags: 4od, a4e, a4e hull, Benefit Busters, Channel 4, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, on demand, virgin media
Did the Government get A4e Benefit Busters Episode 2 pulled from On Demand?
We had recently reported that possibly A4e had pulled Benefit Busters Epidsode 2 from the TV repeat and On Demand services.
Last night there was concerns that maybe the Government was involved in pulling the show off the air and off the internet. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, uk government | Tags: 4od, a4e, a4e hull, Benefit Busters, Channel 4, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, on demand, Studio Lambert, uk government, virgin media
Benefit Busters Episode 2 temporarily pulled to conceal someones identity?
It appears that perhaps A4e did not pull episode 2 and perhaps the Government did not pull episode 2, says a regular blog viewer and commenter:
Channel 4 decided to remove this episode of BENEFIT BUSTERS because
subsequent to transmission a person contacted Channel 4 and asked for his
identity to be concealed in the programme. This person was incidental to the
programme, however, we will re-edit it so that they are not identifiable.
The removal has nothing to do with A4E. The new edit will be available as
soon as possible. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, New Deal | Tags: Benefit Busters, Channel 4, DWP
Benefit Busters Episode 2: Channel 4 pulls Episode 2 preview clips
New Deal Scandal can reveal that Channel 4 has finally pulled the preview clips for Episode 2.
It has caused great controversy when Channel 4 decided to pull the Episode 2 Benefit Busters show from 4od and Virgin Media On Demand service while scrapping the repeat showing too.
There was confusion where most people were advised it wasn’t available due to Channel 4 not having the rights to show it on 4oD On Demand. This extended when cancelling the repeat slot and replacing it with another programme.
Finally, we hear it was due to someone complaining as they were shown in the programme. Only as of today the 2nd September has Channel 4 finally pulled the preview clips (even though Episode 2 of the programme was pulled last week). Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, DWP, New Deal | Tags: Benefit Busters, Channel 4, DWP, uk government
Watch the pulled Episode 2 of Benefit Busters here!
Watch the controversial episode of Channel 4’s Benefit Busters Series 1 at A4e Hull here. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, DWP | Tags: 4od, a4e, Benefit Busters, benefit busters episode 2, New Deal
A4e Hull Benefit Busters Episode 2: now on 4oD
New Deal Scandal can reveal that Episode 2 of Benefit Busters is now back online on the Channel 4 website. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, DWP, New Deal, emma harrison | Tags: a4e, Benefit Busters, DWP, emma harrison
Did Continental Landscapes get Benefit Busters Episode 2 pulled?
Doubts over the real reason for Benefit Busters Episode 2 being pulled has increased tonight when parts of the initial showing wasn’t available for viewing – being completely edited out!
The initial concerns were of such actions being carried out by A4e. Concerns then followed that episode 2 was pulled by the Government. After Channel 4 advised people that it wasn’t on 4oD due to them not having the rights, it was finally emerged that Benefit Busters episode 2 was pulled due to conceal someones identity after someone complaining they featured in it without consent. Read More…
Posted in Benefit Busters | Tags: Benefit Busters, continental landscapes ltd
Benefit Busters: New Deal Scandal launches a new website
New Deal Scandal today officially opens the new Benefit Busters discussion blog aimed to focus specifically on the issues raised in all 3 episodes of the Benefit Busters series 1. Read More…
Posted in Benefit Busters, New Deal | Tags: a4e, Benefit Busters, New Deal, new deal scandal
New Deal TNG: New Deal or Bum Deal
Arturo Ui rather recently posted a long comment on this blog regarding an article on New Deal with the New Deal Provider TNG. I declined it as I thought it would be better as a seperate post than as a comment which would be harder to read. I have added line breaks so it is much easier to read. It is a recommend read on New Deal – Read on… Read More…
Posted in Flexible New Deal, New Deal | Tags: New Deal, TNG
£64.30 weekly jobseekers allowance broken into costs
New Deal Scandal can today reveal the official DWP response of how the £64.50 (over 25) Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) is calculated, after the Department for Work and Pensions responded to a Freedom of Information Act request. Read More…
Government keeps Ipswich Detention Centre open
Ipswich Unemployed Action has reported that Local Government has given YMCA Training the go ahead to keep Dencora House detention centre open. Read More…
Is Jobseekers Allowance actually enough to live on?
We have previously highlighted the Jobseekers Allowance Scandal of how the weekly rate doesn’t include any money to seek employment and what the £64.30 weekly payment is intended to cover.
We will now highlight “How generous is Jobseekers Allowance?” and further criticise the amount of JSA.
Posted in DWP, Welfare Reform, human rights, uk government | Tags: Child Benefit, child tax credit, Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, FoI, freedom of information act, job hunting costs, jobseekers allowance, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, jsa, living expenses, median gross weekly earnings, minimum income standard, minimum standard of living, poverty line, single adult household, state retirement pension, unemployed
Flexible New Deal | New Deal Scandal Review
I think it comes a good time to review the progress, successes and failures of the New Deal Scandal site.
New Deal Scandal is a blog designed to expose the Governments New Deal scheme, the New Deal prime contractors and New Deal subcontractors defrauding the system, the Flexible New Deal, Welfare Reform and the Government’s obvious intent of knowing about the poor conditions imposed on Jobseekers while refusing to do anything about it other than making it worse. Read More…
Posted in Flexible New Deal, New Deal, Welfare Reform, uk government | Tags: new deal scandal
DWP Code Cracked
As wordpress kept messing up, the third time… I given up on the introduction paragraph.
This is a New Deal Scandal exclusive! Read More…
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, Welfare Reform, uk government | Tags: DWP Corporate Abbreviations
Flexible New Deal Discussion
New Deal Scandal has launched a new website called Flexible New Deal Discussion!
Up until now the deal has been I wrote the blog article and you give feedback (whether positive or negative) – since then I have expanded the site so very little by allowing you to rate the article and each individual comment. The maximum I can do with wordpress (thats said wordpress is my favourite blog platform).
I have decided it is a good idea to release a forum (feedback dot flexible new deal dot me dot uk) so you can now create a topic and discuss various topics including New Deal, Flexible New Deal, Welfare Reform and even Tell the world what you would do instead of flexible new deal if you was in charge!
Emma harrison doesn't want to acknowledge the severe shortcomings of a4e
I have just received an email from someone who was kind enough to attach the email conversation with A4e’s Emma Harrison. Well, until she decided not to bother replying. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, emma harrison | Tags: a4e, emma harrison, Flexible New Deal, New Deal
DWP = Dismissed With Prejudice???
OK, we know the Government department is called the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) but what more likely could DWP stand for? Read More…
Posted in DWP, New Deal, uk government | Tags: Detailed Work Plan, Dismissed With Prejudice, Draft Working Paper, DWP
Jobcentre Plus promotes illegal job vacancies
New Deal Scandal can reveal that not only does Jobcentre Plus promote illegal jobs but Department for Work and Pensions actually creates unlawful discriminative employment vacancies. Read More…
A4e works?
A4e works? No it doesn’t! Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, emma harrison | Tags: a4e, a4e works
Victim of Fraud: A4e or the Taxpayer?
You the blog reader may decide. Emma Harrison claims that A4e is a victim of fraud… really?
Not exactly a new issue or article worthy of being called “news”, however, I would like to report corporate happenings behind big businesses such as A4e. New Deal Scandal already reported about an director of A4e of the highest senior rank in regards to finance, stepping down/being demoted after reports of fraud within A4e, which almost got this website shut down. He still works for the company in a more junior role underneath the new finance director.
Now we have a snippet from Emma Harrison stating how A4e uses a PR team and lawyers to bully their way out of any blame. Now, lets not forget even though a business has the right to protect themselves i.e. their reputation, A4e did attempt to shut down this blog and were on the route to even suing me for solely stating that Companies House had recorded that a director who works in finance has resigned his directorship – this comes after allegations of fraud were reported at A4e.
A4e being a company funded by taxpayers money means taxpayers have the right to know basic public accessible information such as management changes within contracted out services. A4e claimed this was libel and was intended as a malice attempt to attack their (allegedly) good reputation. The truth is, even though they have to file such documents by law they wanted this suspicious (although not necessarily guilty) activity kept quiet. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, emma harrison, new deal fraud, uk government | Tags: a4e, a4e fraud, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, new deal fraud
Dear Gordon Brown
Today I have received an email from a New Deal Scandal blog reader and ex-New Deal participant who is upset at his mistreatment of this New Deal farce:
I know its a diabolical situation & I am so glad I found your website because I was beginning to think it was just me who thought the New Deal Programme was such a farce & I was being forced to sign off just to get the unemployment figures down.
Here is a copy of the still yet unanswered letter that has been sent to the manager of the Jobcentre Plus office in Lewisham, all the major tabloids, Yvette Cooper (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Work & Prisons W*nkers and Pillocks), Darra Singh CEO of Jobcentre Plus and Gordon Brown! (Read on) Read More…
Where is the Flexible New Deal Ombudsman?
So, with Flexible New Deal jobseekers are meant to have the following privileges:
- “Customer Choice“: ability to (in some areas) choose provider
- Receiving a statement: stating expectations, how the provider is paid and how they can complain to the Ombudsman
- Independent Ombudsman: as a last resort to complain to
Flexible New Deal providers get the following extra privileges:
- “Employment Officer” status (can contact a Decision Maker and apply for 6 month sanctions)
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, Welfare Reform, human rights, uk government | Tags: DWP, Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal Ombudsman
7260 New Deal vacancies advertised in the last year
New Deal Scandal can confirm (after an Freedom of Information Act request) Jobcentre Plus in the last 12 months ending the 30th September 2009 has advertised 7260 New Deal Jobs.
This is just over an average of 600 New Deal vacancies each month. Read More…
A4e only checks half of claims before claiming job outcomes
Taken from Watching A4e’s Two Memoranda article:
A4e says that it has introduced a procedure whereby 50% of all claims are routinely checked by an independent team which phones the employer to verify that the client is working there, and can check with the Jobcentre that the client is off benefit.
Whats the point of getting an independent team to check just half of the claims to see if they are genuine? Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, Welfare Reform, emma harrison, new deal fraud | Tags: a4e, A4e Ltd, job outcomes, watching a4e
A4e Finance Director demoted after Group Head of Risk recruited
New Deal Scandal can reveal that the former Finance Director was demoted after A4e recruited Sarah Aston, A4e’s newly created position of Group Head of Risk, in April 2009, designed to centrally combat fraud for Flexible New Deal contracts.
Posted in Action 4 Employment, new deal fraud | Tags: a4e, a4e fraud, A4e Ltd, Flexible New Deal, Group Head of Risk, New Deal, new deal fraud
Jobcentre Plus Labour Market System
New Deal Scandal exposes the scam that is the Labour Market System (LMS) or simply put the pool of jobs Employment Officers, New Deal Personal Advisers and Jobseeker Direct staff give to jobseekers as Jobseeker Directions and those on the jobpoints and the direct gov and jobcentre plus websites. Read More…
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, Welfare Reform, uk government | Tags: Actively Seeking Employment, direct gov, Employment Officers, Flexible New Deal, jobcentre Plus, jobcentreplus.gov.uk, jobpoints, Jobseekers Direct, Labour Market System, LMS, National Minimum Wage, New Deal, new deal jobs, New Deal Personal Advisers, Work Trial
New Deal is bad for your health
New Deal is bad for your health! Read More…
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, human rights, uk government | Tags: Careers Development Group, CDG, Dencora House, DWP, Government's Detention Camp, New Deal
Save Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance
SAVE DLA AND ALL DISABILITY BENEFITS
Tony Greenstein
Having already abolished Incapacity Benefit, New Labour has now made it clear that it wants to scrap ALL disability benefits. On July 14th New Labour published a Green Paper, Shaping the Future of Care. Reading through the spin, the message is clear. Disability Living Allowance is ‘inefficient’ ‘poorly targeted’ [because it’s not means tested!] and therefore has to go towards paying for a new national care service. Disability Living Allowance is the best benefit there is. If your needs are great enough, if you cannot care and need help with bodily functions for part or all of the day (and night) you are eligible for Disability Living Allowance. There are 3 bands – lower, middle and higher. Receipt of Disability Living Allowance does not overlap with other benefits and is not counted as taxable income.
The result is that people who are the most vulnerable and sick in this society see a small increase in their standard of living. This is what New Labour hate most of all. The proposal is to use the money for ‘individual budgets’ run by private companies, whereby the disabled, in agreement with the local authority, can spend the money on care. Of course they’ll never actually see the money!! The whole system will be discretionary and, of course, liable to cuts. Anyone with any experience of the existing system of individual budgets knows what a nightmare the whole system is.
The Green Paper talks about abolishing Attendance Allowance which is paid to those 65 and over (Attendance Allowance is the equivalent of the care component of Disability Living Allowance). Instead they intend to force the elderly to pay £20,000 to insure themselves!! The Green Paper talks about replacing not just Attendance Allowance but ‘disability benefits’ – a clear sign that it is not just Attendance Allowance which is in their sights. And the Green Paper dresses up its purpose with the usual New Labour waffle such as proclaiming that “our aspiration (is) to build a stronger, fairer Britain.”
The Attlee Government of 1945-51, which was a right-wing cold war Labour government, introduced the building blocs of the welfare state which New Labour is intent on dismantling. They introduced the 1948 National Assistance Act intended to act as a safety net for those who fell below a certain level of income.
Successive Labour and Tory Governments built on Attlee’s measures. E.g. Disability Living Allowance was introduced by the Major Government in 1992 New Labour has abolished Incapacity Benefit and all but scrapped Income Support. Those who propagate the idea that New Labour is ‘better’ than the Tories and base their strategy on that are deceiving themselves and others..
New Labour prefers a welfare state for bankers in distress, and their ‘benefits’ are paid via stuffing their mouths with gold, whilst expecting the poorest and most deprived sections of the community to pay for it. Meanwhile the leadership of the Trade Unions, like the three wise monkeys, hear nothing, see nothing and say nothing. And more to the point – do nothing. Disability Living Allowance is used to pay for the extra costs that result from being disabled. For example my own son is autistic.
One of the consequences of this is that he is always breaking things, including windows! Disability Living Allowance pays for this. It also enables him to be taken out by his parents, to enjoy videos and DVDs and live as near as possible a normal life including holidays. This is the kind of thing that New Labour is determined to prevent and in its place will be a free-market, semi-privatised, bureaucratically driven National Care Agency which will determine what the needs of the disabled are. Disabled Charities Collaborate with Government The disabled charity sector – Disability Alliance, Mencap and all the other charities who make a good living off the back of the disabled – are the Government’s first port of call.
These so-called ‘representatives’ of the disabled, although no one has ever elected these middle-class worthies, most of whom are not disabled, to this role, are now rolling over to accept New Labour’s latest spin. Their idea of a ‘campaign’ is to get people to take part in the Government’s ‘consultation exercise’. Now no one is suggesting that people boycott the consultation, but to make that the only part of your ‘campaign’ is to fool people into believing that any New Labour ‘consultation’ is actually a genuine exercise, rather than an attempt to convince those they are targetting that New Labour’s medicine will be good for them.
On 1st September Michelle Holland of the Disability Alliance wrote to me saying it was untrue that they supported the abolition of Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance. She suggested writing to one’s MP and take part in the government consultation. Ms Holland boasted that ‘We are members of the Disability Benefit Consortium… We meet regularly with the Department for Work and Pensions and HM Revenue and Customs on a range of benefits related issues.’
Err quite and look where it’s got you. On October 16th Ms Holland followed this up with another letter urging that I contact my MP and assuring me that ‘We are building as robust a defence of Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance as possible and will be trying to demonstrate that.’ Which entirely misses the point that the government’s exercise is not conducted in good faith. The proposals for a national care system are designed to hide the fact that their main goal is the abolition of a benefit that costs over £10 billion a year. When you’ve got hungry bankers to feed, then it is clear what your priorities are.
I therefore wrote back to Ms Holland about her ‘campaign’ asking: ‘Where are the thousands of posters, the meetings, the town hall rallies, the leaflets to MPs securing firm commitments in the run-up to the General Election? Instead you prefer quiet words behind doors with those seeking to find the money to fund the public borrowing deficit incurred as a result of a welfare state that primarily caters today for Bankers and other parasites.
To be blunt your role is an absolute disgrace and since you intend to do nothing it’s about time that the spotlight was turned on people like you who purport to represent the disabled when in actual fact you do nothing but sell them out.’ In fact I had already written to my MP, and the Minister for Disabled, Jonathan Shaw wrote back thus in a letter of 12 October: ‘’Many people and charities, such as Disability Alliance, Mencap, Age Concern and Help the Aged have told us they welcome the chance to discuss and engage [i.e collaborate] with us on these important issues.’
The Fight is on to Save ALL Disability Benefits including Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance (for the 65s and over).
Posted in Benefit Busters, DWP, Welfare Reform, uk government | Tags: Attendance Allowance, Disability Living Allowance
Social Security and Child Support Appeal Tribunal: pathetic!
Flexible New Deal: A step back from New Deal?
Flexible New Deal: A step back from New Deal?
New Deal VSO Vs Flexible New Deal
Although people’s experiences have varied the general idea of the Voluntary Sector Option New Deal scheme was an induction week focusing on CV’s and Application Forms with mild team bulding and job search activity, and 12 weeks of work placement for four days a week and one day a week job search.
Flexible New Deal (unlike the New Deal VSO which didnt require any work placement to be offered) requires providers to offer a mandatory work experience period lasting atleast 4 weeks. This makes this work experience period as an contractual obligation. A good move, however, the period of work experience is decreased to just a third of the intended period offered on New Deal VSO scheme. This is unlikely to be a minimum but a maximum. Read More…
Flexible New Deal: first complaint, first of many?
Flexible New Deal: first complaint, first of many?
Only in its second month participants are already complaining about Flexible New Deal. Sorry to mislead with the publish date much later, this complaint was actually made within 2 weeks of Flexible New Deal. The complaint is about the mistreatment of one participant with Working Links. I am sure many more complaints will follow!
The terrible mistreatment of participants on these schemes were a major issue with New Deal – it appears Flexible New Deal hasn’t sorted out those issues, and word on the street is, it is actually much worse than New Deal and Employment Zones combined.
Posted in Flexible New Deal, Working Links | Tags: complaints, Flexible New Deal, Working Links
Flexible New Deal Sanction Register
Flexible New Deal Sanction Register
In the next few weeks we will be launching a Flexible New Deal Sanction Register where jobseekers on Flexible New Deal who have received either a Flexible New Deal fixed sanction or variable sanction can register it so other jobseekers can view it.
This is not official – we won’t be able to confirm that information submitted is correct – but the purpose is so we can keep track of as many sanctions as possible including useful information such as:
- Provider
- Contract Area & Physical Location
- Fixed sanction or Variable sanction
- Length of variable sanction and length of fixed sanction (for new offences)
- The alleged offence
- A statement by the jobseeker of the actual events (if different from alleged) or the reasons (i.e. I refused to apply for a temporary zero hour contract job)
- Whether the review requested (when you appeal) gets the Decision Maker to see you had “good cause”
- If you were referred to a Decision Maker and the Decision Maker dropped the case (OK not a sanction)
- Appeal Tribunal information
We hope that many Flexible New Deal participants who are unlucky enough to receive a sanction visit this website and find the link to the Sanction Register for Flexible New Deal.
We hope to provide some advice to sanctioned jobseekers such as their rights, hardship fund, how best to appeal, compensation claims and advice for tribunal.
If the problem happens to be a large problem (more so than with New Deal) we might even setup a support network where volunteers will be happy to attend Appeal Tribunals with you (if required).
It would then become a good sample (“sample” because we won’t get every sanction registered) to see the performance of Flexible New Deal providers who sanction jobseekers – the percentage of which fail (i.e. Decision Maker takes no further action), get revised (i.e. Decision Maker looks at it again and drops the case), goes to Appeal Tribunal, successful Tribunal cases and unsuccessful cases.
The statistics would be great so we can determine for instance how many sanctions referrals are put forward by providers which aren’t sanction-able offences (i.e. Decision Maker doesn’t uphold it).
We hope blog readers find this a good idea – we won’t be interested in names, addresses and other contact details and National Insurance numbers. I think copies of letters etc. would be a good idea to prevent false claims – sensitive details therefore can be removed prior to sending.
Flexible New Deal: Mandatory Work Related Activity
Flexible New Deal subcontractors ‘not readily available’
When someone requested a list of the Flexible New Deal phase 1 subcontractors from the Department for Work and Pensions, considering that a) the contracts have been awarded and b) that the Flexible New Deal prime contractors have to disclose the subcontractors with the DWP; you would have thought such a request would have been simple.
But No! The DWP have requested more time stating “I need to extend the time limit because the information you have requested is not readily available and is taking longer then anticipated to collate“. Can it really be that difficult? Is there no centrally compiled list of phase 1 prime contractors and subcontractors? Read More…
Flexible New Deal: another complaint… (Working Links)
Working Links: Another Flexible New Deal complaint
Flexible New Deal Scandal is updated with another complaint about the Government’s newly “improved” version of the original New Deal scheme (as renamed Flexible New Deal). The provider is Working Links….
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal complaints, Working Links | Tags: 0800 917 9262, a4e, Abertillery, Claimants Action South Wales, complaints, Customer Care Leaflet, Flexible New Deal, fnd, inflexible new deal, jobcentre Plus, jobseekers allowance, New Deal 2, Performance Manager, reclaiming travel expenses, travel expenses, Working Links
Flexible New Deal: TNG
A4e attempts another censorship… number 5.. ?
So, Darren Marsh has been back to our site requesting another censorship!
Is it number 4, number 5? I am loosing track on the attempts. Let’s not forget they managed to shut down the original Watching A4e website before too and I am sure many more others!
Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, a4e, emma harrison, human rights, jobcentre Plus, new deal fraud, uk government | Tags: a4e, a4e censorship, Darren Marsh, emma harrison, New Deal, watching a4e
Oh dear, another TNG Flexible New Deal complaint!
Another TNG Flexible New Deal complaint!
Flexible New Deal scandal can report there is another complaint about TNG and Flexible New Deal…
Posted in Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal complaints, TNG, Training Network Group | Tags: DWP, Flexible New Deal, jobcentre Plus, TNG
351 Jobcentre Plus advertised jobs were in the Adult Entertainment Industry
351 Jobcentre Plus advertised jobs were in the Adult Entertainment Industry
Between August 2007 and July 2008 Jobcentre Plus advertised 2.26 million job vacancies, 351 vacancies existed in this period as in the Adult Entertainment industry for jobs such as adult model, adult entertainment presenter, stripper, adult phone chat services and cam girl this equates to 0.015% of all jobs in this period.
This is almost 7 Adult Entertainment jobs per week or almost 30 per month.
Jobcentre Plus doesn’t hold any further information than this period of time.
All Adult Entertainment jobs advertised are legal although the moral implications of a Government agency persuading desperately hard up women (in particular) to appear on late night TV nude talking dirty to get old men to ring up just to have a job, goes against the Government’s aim of preventing prostitution and ensuring equality. Read More…
Posted in DWP, Labour Market System, jobcentre Plus, uk government | Tags: 0904, 0905, 0906, adult entertainment, adult entertainment presenter, adult model, adult phone chat services, cam girl, DWP, jobcentre Plus, jobseekers allowance, Labour Market System, premium phone lines, prostitution, stripper
Flexible New Deal: TNG will never change
We recently reported about a TNG Flexible New Deal complaint about:
- Faking paperwork – forcing participants to sign to say TNG have done stuff they haven’t.
- Lack of equipment – didn’t have a cd/dvd drive to obtain someones CV from CD ROM.
- No contact details – Jobcentre Plus not giving address or phone number of the provider.
- Told by phone to attend interview – didn’t give any details about it and said particulars are in the post. No letter arrived.
- Poorly trained staff – very basic computer skills of how to use mouse and open the jobcentre website.
- Four and a half hour induction course – mostly paperwork related i.e. questionnaires
We have some very bad news for those in a TNG region.
Flexible New Deal Scandal has obtained an Ofsted report from January this year (23rd January 2009) regarding TNG’s New Deal contract in Grays, Essex and the results are very worrying.
Summary:
“Effectiveness of provision” Grade 4 (Inadequate)
“Achievement and Standards” Grade 4 (Inadequate)
“Quality of Provision” Grade 4 (Inadequate)
“Leadership and Management” Grade 4 (Inadequate)
“Preparation of life and work” Grade 4 (Inadequate)
For those who are unaware:
Key for inspection grades
Grade 1 Outstanding
Grade 2 Good
Grade 3 Satisfactory
Grade 4 Inadequate
Grade 4 is the lowest possible grade. So how did TNG get Flexible New Deal contracts when they performed so badly for New Deal in the same year as they started Flexible New Deal contract?
Posted in DWP, Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal complaints, New Deal, TNG, Training Network Group, jobcentre Plus, ofsted, uk government | Tags: DWP, Flexible New Deal, Flexible New Deal complaint, jobcentre Plus, New Deal, New Deal Essex, ofsted reports, TNG, TNG Grays, TNG Inspection Reports, Training Network Group
Welfare Reform: Jobcentre Plus needs to scrap its £40m per year Labour Market System
How much do you think Jobcentre Plus’ failed job system costs per year to run?
£1 million? £5 million? £10 million?
No… the Labour Market System (LMS) costs £39, 663, 300 per year to run. The Department for Work and Pensions didn’t want to disclose the initial setup costs of the Labour Market System under the Freedom of Information Act claiming an exemption because the Labour Market System was setup prior to Jobcentre Plus being founded.
Posted in DWP, Labour Market System, Welfare Reform, jobcentre Plus | Tags: DWP, jobcentre Plus, Labour Market System, taxpayers money
Flexible New Deal: providers request passport, driving licence or birth certificate
We have received reports that some Flexible New Deal providers are requesting the following evidence for the initial interview:
- Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) signing book (ES40)
- A passport, driving licence (card type with photo), birth certificate or medical card
Jobcentre Plus: where do they get the Decision Makers from?
I have been tipped off by a blog viewer about the issue with a Decision Maker trying to apply a sanction for failing to apply for a job given to her as a Jobseeker Direction which is clearly “unreasonable”. Read More…
Posted in DWP, decision maker, jobcentre Plus, uk government | Tags: decision maker, DWP, jobcentre Plus, sanctions
Larry Lamb from Eastenders probes A4e Gateshead
Larry Lamb (famous for playing villain Archie Mitchell in EastEnders and also starring in Gavin and Stacey) is leaving EastEnders and due to star in a new BBC television documentary on unemployed designed to rival Channel 4’s attempt (Benefit Busters).
The documentary is designed to follow probes into how the unemployed are treated – and intended to be more in depth than the “weak” Channel 4 investigation.
The BBC have now decided to look into the lives of job seekers and the issues they face in several locations across the UK. Recent figures showed that the Teesside town of Hartlepool was one of the highest places in the country for unemployment with a high rate of people on the Jobseekers Allowance benefit scheme. Read More…
Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, DWP, Flexible New Deal, New Deal, a4e, emma harrison, jobcentre Plus, new deal fraud, uk government | Tags: a4e gateshead, Archie Mitchell, atv, atv news, bbc, eastenders, emma harrison, gateshead, Gavin and Stacey, hartlepool, larry lamb, teeside
BBC Inside Out: A4e content replaced with Clouds
It was scheduled for Monday 7th December 2009 at 7.30pm; BBC Inside Out Yorkshire & Lincs was to run a story on A4e. Today I went on iPlayer and found the following description:
Nicola Rees looks at what we can learn from past flu pandemics, and Johnny Nelson accompanies a young Bradford man as he finds out about his ancestor who was one of the first black immigrants of Leeds.
On the 2nd December 2009 I posted a comment on this blog after I visited the BBC site with the following description:
Jamie Coulson investigates whether an employment training company is really worth the millions it is paid by the taxpayer. Nicola Rees looks at what we can learn from past flu pandemics, and Johnny Nelson accompanies a young Bradford man as he finds out about his ancestor who was one of the first black immigrants of Leeds.
A quick glimpse of the BBC Inside Out Yorkshire programme makes it appear this reporting has been replaced with something to do with different cloud types.
Searching the internet to find out why, I come across the original article where I found out about this programme…watching a4e, I can confirm that the original article no longer exists (please see Google Cache) whether the Watching a4e admin removed it because it no longer featured or whether a4e had anything to do with it is unknown.
I would appreciate if anyone could end the mystery to as why they removed this from the programme. A4e legal action? Was the featured content in such a short time really that bad?
10 Really useful jobseeker tips
So, there are hundreds of websites out there giving tips to jobseekers. Regardless of the fact those who are responsible for the content having jobs so might imply success, these people haven’t tested them, and many of the tips are outdated or focused for a different country (i.e. USA, Australia etc.) although the foreign company running them might have UK based or focused domains (i.e. .co.uk), with different laws and different job market trends.
This is the administrator of Flexible New Deal Scandal’s recommended tips for you the jobseeker. These are based on my own experience, and are not solely a tip for each job related area i.e. one tip that relates to CV, one tip that related to application forms, one tip that relates to covering letters and one tip that relates to speculative letters etc. as thats a poor excuse for advice.
These tips are more focused on beating longterm unemployment and one tip is extended on job interviews. Read More…
DWP destroys Freedom of Information data
At the start of this century, a law called Freedom of Information Act was created.
We do a lot of reporting of information obtained with this law and recently I have realised that information stopped becoming available from before the 2006-07 tax year – this is apparently due to them having a new computer system. I fully understand this: but the old information… was it destroyed? archived and hidden from the public (surely an offence under the Act)? Is it just left on a train somewhere?
I dont see the fact them having a new computer data system as an valid limitation to such data. When I got a new computer I kept my old hard drives – transfered the stuff I needed and left the rest in case they were needed for future reference.
Has anyone else experienced the DWP witholding information before 2006 (since a request made after 2006)?
Posted in DWP | Tags: Department for Work and Pensions, DWP, freedom of information act
TNG uses Open Source Joomla but hides copyright notice
So… Flexible New Deal provider TNG (Training Network Group) uses Open Source (free*) software to run its website. However, TNG hides such copyright notice by commenting it (keeping it in the source code but ensuring it isn’t displayed on the webpage) out however leaving the message “Website design by Avanta Marketing Department” rather clearly. Read More…
Posted in Flexible New Deal, TNG, Training Network Group | Tags: Avanta Marketing Department, Flexible New Deal, joomla, TNG, Training Network Group
Indus Delta comment
As I am now successfully added to the Indus Delta spam filters my comment is as below Read More…
Posted in Benefit Busters, DWP, Flexible New Deal, Indus Delta, New Deal, jobcentre Plus, unemployment | Tags: Flexible New Deal, Indus Delta, New Deal
Categories
- 1
- a4e
- Action 4 Employment
- Appeal Tribunal
- Benefit Busters
- Community Task Force
- decision maker
- Dencora House
- DWP
- emma harrison
- First tier Appeal Tribunal
- Flexible New Deal
- Flexible New Deal complaints
- Flexible New Deal Sanctions
- human rights
- Indus Delta
- Ipswich
- jobcentre Plus
- Jobcentre Plus Contact Details
- Labour Market System
- New Deal
- new deal fraud
- New Deal Travel Deductions
- ofsted
- Risk Assurance Division
- Social Security and Child Support
- TNG
- Training Network Group
- uk government
- unemployment
- Welfare Reform
- Working Links
- YMCA Training
- Young Persons Guarantee
